Jacques Le Goff on Saint Francis Of Assisi – by Levi
King
Hi all. The information below provides a
basic overview of the first reading for week 9 by Jacques Le Goff. Together
with some questions, I hope you can gain a better understanding of the changing
world in which Francis of Assisi established his own belief system.
Growing
Urbanization:
Land is the basis of life:
- Land clearances = more cultivation
- The ox is replaced by the horse
- Crop rotations emerge. (Triennial – Three per year)
- Increased number of mills
- Increased population
- ‘Holiness’ becomes a town-related practice (Bishop holding power over a town)
- Towns are places of exchange
- Economic and social inequality are now based on possessions and property, not birth and family
- ‘Bankers’ are taking care of money, not monasteries
Question: How do you think the Church benefitted from
this rise of urbanization?
The
Church struggles:
- Social and economic standing:
- Put simply, the Church holds feudal secular domination
- The Problem:
- To quote Le Goff. There soon became a “struggle against the incontinence of the clergy”
- Large separations between the clergy and the laity:
- The church begins to put measures on marriage and cohabitation
- The Result:
- The Gregorian reform:
- A reform of the church which was attempting to adapt to outside events
- It established new religious orders, the canonical movement and acceptance of diversity
- Held a large emphasis on manual labour
- Changes in laity:
- Barriers between the laity and the clergy remained, and the laity increased their religious authority
- For example – Arnold of Brescia (1140s) preached of the corrupt life of the clergy
- Church cannot control the flock
- A new “intellectual environment” is established no longer based solely on religion, but scholasticism
- Real opposition to Christianity emerges: Catharism (an actual religion)
Question: Why do you think that the Church turned to
the more firm doctrines of sin and sacrament during this time of change?
Francis
of Assisi:
- Background:
- Born at the rise of urbanization
- The turbulent social structures above had been established by the time of Francis’ birth
- His religious life:
- The period of Francis’ life saw the laity spark strong opposition to the Church
- Francis was similarly disgruntled by the Church’s supremacy
- Instead of acting in opposition to the clergy, he maintained the practices of “a feeling of poverty,” remaining faithful to the Church “out of humility”
- Ultimately, it seems, he searched for equality between the Church and the laity
Question: What are the limitations to Francis of Assisi’s
‘dream’ the Le Goff brings to light?
Medieval
Civilisation – by Chelsea Dullard
The Inquisition:
During the 12th century, any
heretical beliefs or activities had been regarded as treason against society.
This view was endorsed and approved by the church and it's figureheads, who
originally held faith that accused heretics could once again become diligent
and devoted Christians. However, eventually it was conceded that a line of
formal inquisition and interrogation must be taken in order to control the rise
of dissent within the church. The following procedure usually occurred during
an inquisition...
- Suspected heretics could be accused of heresy and the wilful rejection of the church's influence by a church official, or by a member of the laity.
- Following the initial accusation, the inquisitor would then summon the clergy and the public, where a sermon would be delivered. Then, the inquisitor would call for any heretics to denounce themselves. If someone voluntarily denounced themselves, they were granted indulgence by the church, so long as they wished to return to the fold of Christianity. Reformed heretics were then required to take an oath which affirmed their faith, and intentions to pursue heretics. They were also required to serve penance, and had all possessions taken from them.
- If an accused heretic who refused to renounce their faith, or who returned once again to their heretical behaviour were generally burnt at the stake.
The Mendicant Orders:
A Mendicant is a person owned no property
and practised begging to provide for their daily needs. A series of new orders
emerged, who subscribed to a life of apostolic piety, and who believed that a
person could attain salvation whilst living amongst the people, rather than
confined to isolation. The Franciscans were the first of these revolutionary
orders to emerge....
The Franciscans:
After seeking consolation in Christianity,
Francis Bernardone felt that he had been called to serve God. He felt that to
do so, and in order to live out a life which mirrored that of Christ, he had to
insist on poverty. As such, Francis' followers were not allowed property, and
were required to subsist through manual labour and by begging. The Franciscans
also lived among the people, tending the needs of the poor, and preaching the
word of God. In doing this, they appealed to many Christians desires to live a
life similar to Jesus', one of poverty and of compassion. However, the
Franciscan method of worship was initially regarded as a form of heresy, and
the Pope was quite reluctant to grant the group his approval. Eventually
though, he approved the group, and they were able to continue their
interpretation of Christianity.
The Dominicans:
The Dominicans were another Christian group
who endeavoured to live a life of apostlic piety and poverty. The Dominicans
however, differed from the Franciscan's in that they embraced and encouraged
education and learning. They also governed their group in a much more
modernistic way, the group employed democracy to elect and monitor the actions
of their leaders. The Franciscans and Dominicans had a very similar approach to
evangelising the European population, preaching and living the word of God.
New Forms of Spirituality:
The establishment of Christian groups such
as the Franciscans and the Dominicans embody the transition which occurred in terms of the way
people regarded Christ. Prior to these groups influence, Jesus had been portrayed
as a stern judge, however, during the 12th and 13th
centuries, the human aspects of Jesus were emphasised. This in turn developed a
more inclusive and kindlier church.
The Life of St Francis – by Bronwyn
Brough
In Celano’s account of Francis’ life, with what
values does he imbue the figure of Francis? Discuss with examples from the
text.
From
Celano’s account of Francis, we are led to believe that he is a changed man
after his ‘conversion to God’s work’ from a man who lived ‘riotously among his
relations and acquaintances’ to one who was ‘contemptuous for money’ and
desired ‘wisdom’ and ‘prudence’.
After
hearing the gospel story of Christ sending out the disciples, Francis’ passion
was changed from just the physical rebuilding of churches, into a desire to
build ‘the church’ through preaching and calling people to repentance.
He
attired himself as the disciples would have, but also took it a step further
and made his tunic to the shape of a cross, to beat off temptations, rough to
discourage ‘sins of the flesh’ and poor so that no one would ‘covet it’.
Francis
was portrayed as ‘reverent’ and ‘diligent’, trying hard to do all that the
gospel had said.
Some
of the main values of the Franciscan order were: Contemplation, Humility, and
the desire to imitate Christ.
Celano
describes the way in which Francis lives out these values.
Contemplation: We are told
that they were continuously praying and praising God: They would try many
methods to prevent them from falling asleep during prayer, often painful and
damaging. He practiced mortification of the flesh: “not because the body was
considered evil- it too was created by God-‘, but because it would distract one
from ‘higher pursuits’.
Humility and Patience: They
sought out bodily persecution rather than being exalted by the world
Desire to imitate Christ:
while not an exact imitation of what Christ did; Francis desired to suffer
martyrdom at the hands of the Moslems. This may have been come from the idea of
Christ dying for the world, and thus he may have felt that if Christ died in
this way, so must he if he were to really imitate Christ.
Francis
also appeared to value obedience to God, and through his obedience he was
granted authority over animals (p230, 3rd paragraph from the bottom)
Francis
was also consistent in his disdain for wealth; thus he was regarded well by his
enemies and was able to preach to the sultan.
From Celano’s stories, how do you understand
Francis’ relationship with the natural world?
Francis
highly regarded all of God’s creation, including the human body (despite the
mortification inflicted upon his own body), -I think this is apparently a new
idea to the Christian community at the time?-
Celano
tells of many occasions where Francis has an almost unnatural relationship with
animals and nature.
It
seems that Francis’ view on nature is that everything is created by God, and is
thus good. When he is talking to the birds, he expresses his views on how God,
their creator, ‘protects and governs’ them. His view on their song and
behaviour is that it is an act of worship and reverence to their creator.
Francis
appears to see God’s authority over the natural world and from Celano’s account
uses that authority in his interaction with many animals; as seen in his
telling the swallows to be still and quiet while he preached the word of God.
Celano
seems to think that it is through Francis’ obedience to god, that he is granted
this gift of authority from God, in being able to command nature. He is
described as being able to perform miracles such as healing, even just through
being able to touch an object, and that ‘power’ is retained within the object
afterwards (such as his clothes, the reins of a horse he had ridden, bread he had
blessed, even hay in a manger he had blessed). Whether we believe this is
possible or not is irrelevant, what is important is that they believed it then
and that is something that influences their lives and reactions to Francis and
through him, God.
16 comments:
What I found most appealing about these readings was Slocum's discussion of the Mendicant Orders; in particularly, his argument that the move towards recreating apostolic life sparked both heretics and the Dominicans and Franciscans. I think this challenges perceptions of the medieval Church, in that it highlights how some radical beliefs or movements were able to escape the persecutions of the inquisition and went on to become Catholic institutions.
Hi everyone, Kellie here.
I found reading about St Francis quite a strange experience. I had a childhood picture of him as a sweet man who communes with animals. Now I find him a radical who mortified his flesh and desired a martyr’s death. What was it about the changes in medieval culture that drove people to believe that harming themselves (harming God’s creation) would bring them closer to God? Imitating the suffering of Christ seems like arrogance and damaging the body that was a bit disrespectful. It seems that somehow Christianity had become a bit gory. Was this just a product of a very violent society or was the simplicity of Jesus’ teachings becoming lost in the Churches scramble for power?
I find it strange how St Francis loved and respected nature so much as God's work yet he participated in self mortification which is in fact destroying God's work. Although on the other hand he did many other things for God like building and restoring churches which he should be praised for.
(Stephanie Dumble)
Hi all.
St Francis was definitely strange, but part of his strangeness was a considered attempt to force contemporaries to reflect on the sinfulness and corruption of their lives. He respected creation as God's work, but he also knew that since Adam and Eve humans were fallen, and needed to try and overcome bodily distractions and urges (like sexual desire, desire for tempting foods and drink, desire for glory, money, status, etc) which were thought to have originated in Original Sin. Before that humankind had been perfect, like God. They still had that potential but had to try and go beyond their worldly concerns to actualise it. Francis and others' practice of self-moritfication whether by wearing hair shirts, or not eating, or whipping themselves, or sleeping on rock, or not sleeping at all, etc., were about trying to force the mind to concentrate on the 'real' issues of spiritual grace and goodness and leave the 'fallen' state of humankind behind. Do you see how this is different from saying God's creation is bad?
Kellie - your observation about how you used to imagine St Francis is an important one because it shows us the changability in religious understanding of the same phenomenon. Compared with the medieval, modern Christianity is kind of like Christianity-lite (and I don't mean that in a derogatory sense). Its emphases are on the kind, good, friendly aspects: it favours the New Testament over the Old. It avoids, doesn't mention, or regards as 'metaphorical' the parts about sacrifice, blood, death, the horrors of living in a sinful state, women's inferiority, and so on. There are complex reasons for this, one of which is the shift - notably during the 20th century - to a religion which tried to appeal to the masses rather than preach at them (to put it extremely crudely). The experience of the two World Wars played a part in that. However, the main thing for our purposes is not to understand why it's different now, as much as to recognise that it was different then and try to get inside their minds as much as we are able. And if you want to think more about religious change, you can take Peter Howard's 3rd year course on the history of the Papacy over nearly 2000 years, 'Angels & Demons', which will be offered again (I think) in 2013...
I really liked the short little bit about the Medieval inquisition. The blatant condemnation that they had for people who were 'heretics' I thought was really interesting. Basically any association with a heretic could land you in hot water, as well as even the dead can be dug up and condemned for heresy! Talk about over-dramatic! Kathleen, or anyone presenting, do you know how many people were condemned for heresy during this time? Are there any plausibly accurate statistics?
I don't know the answer Lauren - but if you're interested in the Inquisition I particularly recommend the works of R.I. Moore (especially The Formation of a Persecuting Society); and John H. Arnold. Their work will give you more clues if it doesn't give you the answer itself.
Hi all. I found this weeks readings very interesting. With growing urbanisation came growing temptations to sin. This is why I believe groups such as the Franciscans were able to become popular. people were seeing money corrupt and saw absolute poverty as a means of getting closer to God. Also in the face of growing temptations and sin the Church put a greater emphasis on the sacraments and confession to account for this. What do people think about these thoughts? Does anyone think the Church was threatened by the ever increasing material world and this motivated the strong response to heretics to ensure they retained power or were inquisitions purely based on upholding religious ideology?
The readings on St. Francis were interesting this week. His decisions to live a 'Christ-like' life and reject the notions of wealth and possessions offers a stark contrast to the popes and bishops living in oppulence. The first reading that described the churches struggle to control and maintain positive relationships with lay people and peasants was interesting. You can understand how a a slight rift would occur between the clergy and laity when members of the clergy appeared corrupt and taxed for the purpose of increasing their own wealth.
As other people have discussed, I found St Francis a really interesting (although somewhat contradictory) character. His beliefs regarding living in poverty and embodying the life of Christ must have seemed quite unusual for the time. It's interesting that the Church eventually accepted the Franciscan Order and the Dominican order, but people who held other beliefs, seemingly just different variants of Christianity, were persecuted. The list of crimes for which a person could be labelled a heretic was also really interesting - it looks like you had to be pretty careful not to say anything radical or in any way against the Church, even at the young age of 12 or 14.
--Steph K
I find that it is interesting that while the Church was very harsh on heretics and those who had a different way of conducting themselves religiously, the Franciscans were accepted. The reading makes says the pope was initially reluctant to accept them but was there any wider opposition towards them at all? Also as a time we think as being heavily dominated by religion, the average person doesn't seem to very accurately abide by the Churches teachings and we also know the Church even allowed itself to turn a blind eye to these.
It is interesting to see that the new religous groups influenced the church in terms of their views about the human aspect of Jesus.
I found this weeks readings to be interesting, particularly the parts about the Inquisition, as I've not really known much about it until now - other than the Monty Python sketch. Considering it was a response by the Church to try to combat heretics, I would have thought that by making martyrs out of heretics it would have almost encouraged them. I thought the begging friars drew an interesting parallel with the practices of Buddhist monks, who live by a similar rule even today.
I thought it was interesting the way St. Francis is portrayed to have a strong connection with the natural world and its creations. Though he participated in acts of self-mortification, like Kathleen and Tom have mentioned, it was an act of purification and modesty. His devotion and commitment, no matter how peculiar it was, is hence depicted in an admirable light which strongly contrasts that of other members of the church.
I found it interesting that the church gave second chances to heretics but if they faultered again they were punished as extremely as the heretics that would not renounce their faith. Also the similarities between the Franciscans and the Dominicans is uncanny considering they both arose at the same time so they had no means in which to copy each other. This shows that there must have been a few people during that time that all had the same restlessness with how they were being told to worship.
Hi all, I found the differences with the Dominicans which seemed to start up first in 1170AD and the Franciscan later in 1182AD,are that both attracted female followers, the Dominicans favoured universities and no manual labour, the other based on manual labour, no money, and begging for food. the people gave them food and shelter to be closer to God, which they may have need to show due to the changes taken place within their environment. The church would have had benefits by the increases of population coinage, financial agreements, and growth in the economic revolution that was taken place. During this time an increase in devotion to the Virgin Mary and she had a huge following with women, churches sprang up everywhere which would have put the conventional church on the back foot and needed to perhaps enforce their doctrines. Francis of Assisi dream one was that he dreamed his stigmata and two to spread the word of God through travel preaching the ideal life, as far as limitations I'm stumped anyone have an idea?
Reading about the life of st Francis is really fascinating. It sounds like he lived a very intentionally tough life, wearing rough clothing and sleeping on rocks and the like, though the dedication and the values behind it are really interesting. He lived a life based on discouraging the 'sins of the flesh' and overcoming temptations while trying to be closer to Christ. It is also interesting to note his relationship with nature, and his ideas that, as everything is created by god, there is an inherent goodness to the natural world that should be respected.
From Georgia Cowling
Post a Comment